Monday, January 7, 2013

NOTES FROM A NATIVE SON


Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth

April 27, 2010

This Declaration was adopted by the World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth, in Bolivia. The Bolivian government has submitted it to the United Nations for consideration.


Preamble 

We, the peoples and nations of Earth:

considering that we are all part of Mother Earth, an indivisible, living community of interrelated and interdependent beings with a common destiny;

gratefully acknowledging that Mother Earth is the source of life, nourishment and learning and provides everything we need to live well;

recognizing that the capitalist system and all forms of depredation, exploitation, abuse and contamination have caused great destruction, degradation and disruption of Mother Earth, putting life as we know it today at risk through phenomena such as climate change;

convinced that in an interdependent living community it is not possible to recognize the rights of only human beings without causing an imbalance within Mother Earth;

affirming that to guarantee human rights it is necessary to recognize and defend the rights of Mother Earth and all beings in her and that there are existing cultures, practices and laws that do so;

conscious of the urgency of taking decisive, collective action to transform structures and systems that cause climate change and other threats to Mother Earth;

proclaim this Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, and call on the General Assembly of the United Nation to adopt it, as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations of the world, and to the end that every individual and institution takes responsibility for promoting through teaching, education, and consciousness raising, respect for the rights recognized in this Declaration and ensure through prompt and progressive measures and mechanisms, national and international, their universal and effective recognition and observance among all peoples and States in the world.


Article 1. Mother Earth 

(1) Mother Earth is a living being.

(2) Mother Earth is a unique, indivisible, self-regulating community of interrelated beings that sustains, contains and reproduces all beings.

(3) Each being is defined by its relationships as an integral part of Mother Earth.

(4) The inherent rights of Mother Earth are inalienable in that they arise from the same source as existence.

(5) Mother Earth and all beings are entitled to all the inherent rights recognized in this Declaration without distinction of any kind, such as may be made between organic and inorganic beings, species, origin, use to human beings, or any other status.

(6) Just as human beings have human rights, all other beings also have rights which are specific to their species or kind and appropriate for their role and function within the communities within which they exist.

(7) The rights of each being are limited by the rights of other beings and any conflict between their rights must be resolved in a way that maintains the integrity, balance and health of Mother Earth.


Article 2. Inherent Rights of Mother Earth

(1) Mother Earth and all beings of which she is composed have the following inherent rights:

(a) the right to life and to exist;

(b) the right to be respected;

(c) the right to regenerate its bio-capacity and to continue its vital cycles and processes free from human disruptions;

(d) the right to maintain its identity and integrity as a distinct, self-regulating and interrelated being;

(e) the right to water as a source of life;

(f) the right to clean air;

(g) the right to integral health;

(h) the right to be free from contamination, pollution and toxic or radioactive waste;

(i) the right to not have its genetic structure modified or disrupted in a manner that threatens it integrity or vital and healthy functioning;

(j) the right to full and prompt restoration the violation of the rights recognized in this Declaration caused by human activities;


(2) Each being has the right to a place and to play its role in Mother Earth for her harmonious functioning.


(3) Every being has the right to wellbeing and to live free from torture or cruel treatment by human beings.


Article 3. Obligations of human beings to Mother Earth

(1) Every human being is responsible for respecting and living in harmony with Mother Earth.


(2) Human beings, all States, and all public and private institutions must:

(a) act in accordance with the rights and obligations recognized in this Declaration;

(b) recognize and promote the full implementation and enforcement of the rights and obligations recognized in this Declaration;

(c) promote and participate in learning, analysis, interpretation and communication about how to live in harmony with Mother Earth in accordance with this Declaration;

(d) ensure that the pursuit of human wellbeing contributes to the wellbeing of Mother Earth, now and in the future;

(e) establish and apply effective norms and laws for the defence, protection and conservation of the rights of Mother Earth;

(f) respect, protect, conserve and where necessary, restore the integrity, of the vital ecological cycles, processes and balances of Mother Earth;

(g) guarantee that the damages caused by human violations of the inherent rights recognized in this Declaration are rectified and that those responsible are held accountable for restoring the integrity and health of Mother Earth;

(h) empower human beings and institutions to defend the rights of Mother Earth and of all beings;

(i) establish precautionary and restrictive measures to prevent human activities from causing species extinction, the destruction of ecosystems or the disruption of ecological cycles;

(j) guarantee peace and eliminate nuclear, chemical and biological weapons;

(k) promote and support practices of respect for Mother Earth and all beings, in accordance with their own cultures, traditions and customs;

(l) promote economic systems that are in harmony with Mother Earth and in accordance with the rights recognized in this Declaration.


Article 4. Definitions 

(1) The term “being” includes ecosystems, natural communities, species and all other natural entities which exist as part of Mother Earth.


(2) Nothing in this Declaration restricts the recognition of other inherent rights of all beings or specified beings. 

Friday, December 7, 2012

NOTES FROM A NATIVE SON


The Rise of the Sharing Communities

Creative Commons photo by Lobkovs
As the sharing economy picks up momentum, its reach has become global. In cities and towns around the world, people are creating ways to share everything from baby clothes to boats, hardware to vacation homes. There are also groups emerging that consciously identify with the big-picture sharing movement. These groups focus on education, action and community-building, and advocate for a cultural shift toward widespread sharing.
From neighborhood-level cooperatives to global organizations, these groups work to bring sharing into the mainstream. They see sharing as a new paradigm; a means to a more democratic society, and they understand that sharing is not a new fad but an ancient practice that technology is reinvigorating.
What follows is a far-from-exhaustive list of sharing advocacy groups around the world. There are, certainly, many others. Ideally, this list will serve as a springboard for connecting with a sharing community near you, or one that is aligned with your vision for a shareable world.
Ouishare
With hubs in Paris, London, Berlin, Barcelona, Rome and Brussels, Ouishare is an international network of entrepreneurs, citizens, activists, journalists and designers working toward the development of the collaborative economy.
“To me, the question is not so much about whether access is better than ownership,” says Ouishare co-founder Antonon Leonard. “It's about people. It's a change in culture. People have just started to realize that they have amazing opportunities to express themselves, be their own bosses, and start a new life.”
Leonard stresses that community “is everything” and that Ouishare is built around people who do things, not those who say they will do things.
“We need complex solutions to solve complex world issues,” he says. “We bet that it's only by connecting people with different perspectives that we'll be able to bring sustainable change. Sharing is an amazing opportunity to build a community and you need to build a community in order to make sharing work.”“We bet that it's only by connecting people with different perspectives that we'll be able to bring sustainable change.
Shared Squared
Based in New York, Shared Squared is helping people to share by holding events, providing resources to empower sharing economy innovators, and making it easier for people to get involved in the movement.
“Our approach is simply to give people the opportunity to learn about, know about, meet and support other people in the same industry,” says Shared Squared founder, Adam Berk. “If there is one industry that should collaborate, it's ours. So I want to make sure we all work together and support each other when possible and where it makes sense...I think we are unique in the fact that we are transparent, do not care about politics and have a no nonsense policy when it comes to competition: everyone in the space is welcome, no matter how big you are.”
Berk would like to see the sharing economy move away from telling people why they should share, and focus on making sharing cheaper, better, more convenient and more fun. He believes that in the future, third parties will play a bigger role in managing risk, inventory and maintenance for P2P companies.
“I do not think you need to be a Treehugger to share,” he says. “Rich people share yachts and planes. When you are not using your money, you put it in the bank. The sharing economy in general has done a bad job at marketing. Hotels are not the antithesis of Airbnb. Hotels are actually shared rooms too, just with a different model. The third party plays a bigger role in a transaction that is still P2P in reality.”
The People Who Share
The UK-based organization the People Who Share is working to bring sharing mainstream. Committed to “reshaping the world through sharing,” their vision is a thriving sharing economy where everyone is a supplier of tools, resources, goods, experiences, time and experience. Recently, along with partners Ouishare and Shareable, they organized the first ever Global Sharing Day.
“Fundamentally, we live on a planet with finite resources and we have a growing population, we are going to need to share to survive,” says Benita Matofska, Chief Sharer at the People Who Share. “The businesses and organisations of the future are those who build their models around the sharing of resources.”
“What differentiates the sharing economy from our current economic model,” Matofska says, “is that this new economy is built by, with and for people and planet. Fundamentally people unite around the idea that we have unlimited sharing potential and sharing is how we build strong, sustainable, happy connected communities.”
Unstash
Unstash is a peer-to-peer platform for collaborative consumption that works to facilitate and enhance the sharing experience by making sharing fun, easy and social. The Toronto-based organization is “laser focused on the essence of sharing,” says Unstash co-founder Lon Wong. “We're not about connecting strangers to make a few dollars, and we're not even about swapping which can become dependent on a coincidence of wants. We exist to facilitate and enhance the sharing experience for community good.”
For Wong, sharing isn't merely about saving money, or living simply, or the environment, it's about our shared humanity. “The sharing of things can seem trivial,” he says. “But in my experience, sharing something even small and tangible can become a gateway towards the sharing of life in deep and meaningful ways.”
Let’s Collaborate!
Let's Collaborate! is an event series developed to inspire and connect the collaborative consumption community in New York City.
“The purpose of Let’s Collaborate! is to gather entrepreneurs, academics, VCs, and people passionate about the sharing economy together over thought- provoking events,” says Melissa O’Young, founder of Let’s Collaborate!. “I believe that something magical happens when you put a group of passionate people in a room together. My goal,” she continues, “is to create a core community of sharing economy enthusiasts first, which will hopefully inspire them to infect the greater community towards more collaborative behaviors.”
P2P Foundation
The P2P Foundation is “an observatory of open, sharing, P2P and commons-oriented activities.” Playing host to numerous conferences and boasting 18,000 articles on the matter, the organization is a valuable hub of information for researchers and practitioners of the sharing economy.
“Different phenomena have led to a big underlying paradigm shift in favor of sharing,” says Michel Bauwens, one of the founders of the P2P Foundation. “Networked internets have dramatically decreased the coordination and transaction costs, making access to shared resources often cheaper than ownership of an individual resource. You keep all the advantages but at dramatically lower cost,” he continues. “This changes the perspective from individual scarcity-driven behaviour (I buy this because I may need it), to abundance-driven behaviour in which there is a confidence that access to a resource will be possible without owning it.”
KoKonsum
"The sharing economy is going to be a major driver for a new kind of economy we are heading towards.”Based in Germany, KoKonsum is an open network for people interested in the sharing economy. The organization seeks to give visibility to existing, as well as new, sharing economy startups, and initiatives that everybody can be part of.
“In my opinion, the sharing economy is going to be a major driver for a new kind of economy we are heading towards,” says Daniel Bartel, founder of KoKonsum. “Collaborative Consumption will disrupt many industries, help tackle environmental problems, empower people to fulfill their dreams and build a new sense of trust.”
He emphasizes the importance of trust and reputation in moving the sharing economy forward saying, “Only in trusted peer networks is it possible to carefully share ones things with others. This doesn’t mean that you need to know everyone personally, but it is important that you have a reputation of being trustworthy.”
Consumo Colaborativo
Consumo Colaborativo is a digital media platform to spread information and best practices to the sharing community. Based in Spain, the organization acts as a connecting point for various people and projects and an information hub for sharing enthusiasts.
“The sharing economy is about understanding consumption and ownership are means to an end but not the final end/objective itself,” says Consumo Colaborativo founder Albert Canigueral. “We have lived in an extremely inefficient way for the last decades and collaborative consumption allows to make a more rational use of all the stuff already built and the new stuff that humans will keep creating.”
Share Tompkins
Based in Ithaca, New York, Share Tompkins steers people to resources that already exist, such as food pantries and freeskool, as well as sharing platforms that are emerging locally, such as the Ithaca Carshare and the Ithaca Biodiesel Cooperative. It also helps to organize and spread the word about skillshares, swaps, barters and other sharing events.
“Sharing is not in any way a new idea,” says Share Tompkins co-founder Shira Evergreen, pointing out that Ithaca is home to Ithaca Hours, the oldest alternative local currency in the U.S. that is still operating. “What's exciting about this particular moment in time is the fusion of sharing with technology, design and entrepreneurship. It is as if we are collectively relearning how to rely on one another and to do so we need to harness the tools of our time. I believe that once sharing has become second nature again,” she continues, “we will be less reliant on particular sharing platforms and settle into a new/old modality where we see our local community as an interconnected web of resources that can meet everyone's needs.”
Collaborative Consumption
Working to promote access over ownership, and "unlock the idling capacity" of assets in ways that offer enormous social, economic and environmental potential, Collaborative Consumption is a global advocate for the sharing economy.
“The key benefit of the sharing economy that we are the most passionate about is that it empowers people,” says Rachel Botsman, founder and director of Collaborative Consumption and author of the book What’s Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live. “It empowers people to live more sustainably, to build community in new ways, to make money from their existing assets and most importantly, to rediscover a human connection we have lost somewhere along the way.”
Botsman and her team focus on getting the business community on board with the sharing economy through speeches, interviews, articles, consultation and connecting diverse organizations.
“One of the beautiful things about the community around Collaborative Consumption is its diversity,” says Botsman. “You can be in a small town and have a local leader championing ideas, to a swanky VC office where the partners are telling you it’s the next big thing, to a government leader taking a proactive role in growing the sector. Connecting all these different groups, getting them to talk the same language and realize their objectives can be aligned is something our community is passionate about.”
LETSLinkUK
Local Exchange Trading Systems or Schemes (LETS) are community-based networks in the UK in which people trade goods or services. LETSLinkUK tests and develops models for exchange currencies, provides a central platform for existing LETS schemes and helps interested communities develop their own local exchange currency.
Sharetribe
A network of online communities that share goods, services, rides, spaces and more, the Finland-based Sharetribe facilitates sharing in a trusted environment. An open source platform, Sharetribe is made up of sharers, “tribes” of sharers, coders interested in developing on top of Sharetribe code and local ambassadors who translate and spread information about Sharetribe in their communities.
“We strongly believe that access will triumph over ownership in the long term,” says co-founder and CEO Juho Makkonen. “It was the way the world was organized before, and in many areas it will happen again. Building communities is at the very core of sharing, and also at the very core of Sharetribe,” he continues. “For most people, it's difficult to trust all the people in the world so communities help us create trust. Community is also a powerful motivator: people who identify themselves with a certain community usually want to contribute to it's common interests.”
Post-Growth Institute
“By sharing more, we open up the ability for an equitable economic model to fully emerge.”With a tagline, “From bigger, towards better,” the Post-Growth Institute provides platforms for people to offer insights about sharing in an economic context. Advocates for reduction in consumption and minimizing one’s ecological footprint, the Australian-based institute supports and promotes sharing communities and prominent sharing advocates, organizes community and networking events including Free Money Day, and provides numerous articles and resources.
“By sharing more, we open up the ability for an equitable economic model to fully emerge,” says Post-Growth Institute founder, Donnie Maclurcan. “Sharing reminds us that there is enough to go around in this world, and that we don't need unhealthy competition in order for that distribution to take place. By sharing,” he continues, “dysfunctional status envy and the notion that private ownership is the epitome of a 'civilised' society can be nullified in a supportive way.”
He notes that sharing is nothing new, but we now have the benefit of technology to assist us. “The modern return to shared access models,” he says, “has the ability to place old wisdoms about custodianship into a modern context that has the new benefit of powerful digital platforms to facilitate effective sharing.”
Sharers of San Francisco
Formed to connect people interested in the new, sharing economy, Sharers of San Francisco facilitates events, dinners and Meetups where participants can meet other sharing enthusiasts, learn from each other and make connections in the sharing movement.
“What's unique about the Sharers of San Francisco,” says Chelsea Rustrum, founder of the group and author of the forthcoming book, It’s a Shareable Life, “is that we get people together who enjoy sharing. These are the people that need to be talking: the P2P founders, Airbnb hosts, Couchsurfers, coworking mavens, car sharers and ride sharing advocates. We don't just get the peer-to-peer marketplace founders together for education chats,” she continues. “Instead, we invite users and founders to get together for largely unstructured events like Collaborative Happy Hours and Coworking Days...We get the right people talking and helping one another through conversations and potential collaborations.”
School of Commoning
The School of Commoning is a worldwide community of people participating in the local and global commons. It offers workshops, seminars and courses and has a thriving online presence to connect sharing advocates and facilitators.
“School of Commoning works to enhance individual and collective competences in the creation, protection, and governance of commons,” says George Por, co-founder of the school. “Commons are what we share in common not through ownership for private gain but through stewardship of resources needed for a good life. As we move towards a commons-based society,” he continues, “we see more and more examples of trust, reciprocity and relationships replacing the commodification of goods and services.”
He emphasizes that community-building is an essential element to creating a commons-based world.
“Building communities around sharing is a key building block of the world we want to live in,” he says. “It is the practical way to get there. Without such learning communities that don’t just talk about ideas but act as laboratories of learning and using new tools, we would just recreate the old structures that got us the mess in the first place.”
Las Indias
An Iberian Peninsula-based cooperative, Las Indias advocates for distributed, P2P practices as a revived economic model. The group behind the book The P2P Mode of Production: an Indiano Manifesto, Las Indias educates people about the benefits of the sharing economy, promotes the commons and connects participants in the sharing movement.
Collaborative Chats
A monthly series in San Francisco for the collaborative consumption movement, Collaborative Chats brings together leaders, participants and curious bystanders of the sharing economy for panel-style discussions. The chats, which Shareable is a founding partner of, range from topics of funding and gaining traction in the movement to exploring how and why Generation Y-ers are more interested in sharing than owning.
Share Exchange
One of the nation’s first local economy centers, the Share Exchange in Santa Rosa, Calif. is a community meeting place, a collaborative co-working space, a local made marketplace and a non-profit promoting local economies.
“Share Exchange is at the crossroads of the localization movement and the shift to sharing,” says co-founder Kelley Rajala. “We are a unique intersection of sharing, exchanging and local economic development.”
Rajala explains that we simply can’t continue to consume as we have been and that being in the most wealthy, powerful and resource-consuming nation, she feels a responsibility to facilitate the transition toward a sharing lifestyle.
“By having a physical shared location and organizing events, mixers and swaps, we have cued up the opportunity for people to meet new friends,” she says. “Sharing becomes a natural activity within a trusted circle of people.”
Mesh Labs
Built around the principles introduced by author/entrepreneur Lisa Gansky in her book The Mesh: Why the Future of Business is Sharing, Mesh Labs serves to help businesses succeed in the sharing economy. With a global reach and a reputation as leaders within the sharing movement, Gansky and her team utilize technology, social media and community connections to educate startup and existing companies about the wisdom of embracing “the new wave of information-enabled commerce that's also improving our communities and our planet.”
Shareable Australia
The recently-created Australian channel of Shareable Magazine, Shareable Australia acts to create person-to-person connections within the sharing movement. The channel helps to facilitate and spread the word about Meetups, unconferences, swap meets and the sharing marketplace, and reports on local movements and events.
“The sharing movement provides a compelling alternative vision for succeeding in the 21st century by placing commons-based models at the centre of our politics, economics and society,” says Shareable Australia editor Darren Sharp. “The central idea of the commons is that resources, both physical & knowledge-based, can be shared for mutual benefit that give people access to an ends (a ride to work, lemons or an encyclopedia) without needing to own the means to produce these assets.”
Sharp notes that sharing enables individuals to define themselves through relationships of trust, reputational standing and social connectedness rather than the commodity treadmill of mainstream consumer culture.
“Common sense tells us that relationships matter and provide the basis for happy, productive people and communities,” he says. “The sharing movement can help us get over our attachment to stuff and re-frame idle material possessions and surplus knowledge as an exciting opportunity to share, learn and connect with those around us.”
Pioneering Organizations
Many of the above-listed groups are new kids on the block in the world of sharing. There are several well-established, pioneering sharing organizations that have long been leading the way including North American Students of Cooperation; The Center for Popular Economics; The New Economics Institute; and the New Economics Foundation.
Your Sharing Groups
As we journeyed down the rabbit hole of sharing groups, with each one leading to another, we became aware of just how many organizations are advocating for sharing. We want to know who is out there doing what, and to connect the groups with Shareable readers. In the comments, please let us know what sharing advocacy organizations exist in your community.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

NOTES FROM A NATIVE SON


In Sandy’s Wake, New York’s Landscape of Inequity Revealed

The shock of Sandy is still rippling across the northeastern United States. But in the microcosm of New York City, we can already see who’s going to bear the brunt of the damage. As Hurricane Katrina demonstrated, floodwaters have a way of exposing the race and class divisions that stratify our cities.Flood damage to the subway system will disproportionately affect the lower-income New Yorkers who use it the most, worsening structural inequality. (MTA / Flickr / Creative Commons).
Though some bus and subway service is returning, many neighborhoods dependent on public transportation remain functionally shuttered. Not surprisingly, recent surveys show that Metropolitan Transit Authority ridership consists mostly of people of color, nearly half living on less than $50,000 a year in one of the world’s most expensive cities.
It’s true that Sandy’s path of destruction was to some extent an equal opportunity assault, pummeling the trendiest downtown enclaves and blighted neighborhoods alike. But residents' levels of resilience to the storm--the capacity to absorb trauma--will likely follow the sharp peaks and valleys of the city’s economic landscape.
Even before the storm, inequities arose in the city's disaster preparations. Many public-housing residents who stayed behind in evacuation zones were preemptively blacked out, left without elevators, heat or hot water. Meanwhile, once again, in a repeat of Hurricane Irene, the city was criticized for shamelessly denying the incarcerated at Rikers Island an adequate evacuation plan.
Now, floodwaters have ravaged the Lower East Side--a historical bastion of immigant social movements and a dense community of low-income people of color, mostly of Latino and Asian descent. Hundreds have taken shelter at a local school, community service organizations are struggling to stabilize neighborhoods, and some Chinatown activists have reported ugly run-ins with the police during their relief efforts.
Endemic social tensions may intensify as households and communities across lower Manhattan and the outer boroughs face both a transportation shutdown and large-scale displacement: public schools closed, battered storefronts practically abandoned. Many struggling residents will be depending on emergency food rations. In outlying areas such as Far Rockaway, seniors and people with disabilities are especially endangered by power outages combined with physical isolation. In old neighborhoods such as the historic Coney Island district, workers and local small businesses are further hobbled by a lack of insurance.
Now commuter routes are gradually coming back online, but not fast enough to meet the needs of those New Yorkers who can least afford to miss a day of work. The Transportation Equity Atlas of the Pratt Center for Community Development clearly maps out just how long and contorted commutes can be for the poor and people of color:
Three-quarters of a million New Yorkers travel more than one hour each way to work, and two-thirds of them earn less than $35,000 a year. By contrast, just 6 percent of these extreme commuters earn more than $75,000 a year. Black New Yorkers have the longest commute times, 25 percent longer than white commuters; Hispanic commuters have rides 12 percent longer.
In addition, as the Pratt Center's director of policy, Joan Byron, told Working In These Times via email, the economic impact of the transit shutdown will be “more severe on low- and moderate-income workers, who have fewer options for taking time off or flexing their workplace and schedules.” Some might lose income because their workplaces are closed, and others could face the burden of “having to find childcare if your workplace is open but your kids' school is closed.”
Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism notes that across the five boroughs, which span an “income disparity as high as China,” the hardest-hit workers belong to the forgotten ranks of “the janitors, the cooks and delivery men, the people who run newsstands and dry cleaners and cobblers and food carts” and the health care workers who respond to day-to-day emergencies. The mostneglected survivors will presumably be those who lack insurance, those living paycheck to paycheck, those without the legal know-how and social supports needed to navigate systems of disaster relief.
Sandy's uneven impact isn't isolated to the United States; in Cuba, the Dominican Republic and Haiti, the destruction was especially acute in areas with deeper poverty and weaker infrastructure. Globally, the disaster highlights the irony that the poorest typically contribute far less to environmental damage than the elite, but face the worst environmental burdens (though they also manage in some places to respond and resist through innovative grassroots environmental initiatives).
But even within supposedly prosperous U.S. cities, natural disasters compound manufactured inequality. The aid effort following another disaster in New York, the September 11 attacks, was undermined by the government's profound disconnect from the poor. A report by the Urban Justice Center found that after 9/11 hit local communities with huge job losses, “the main problem with disaster aid was not that too many individuals and families sought aid; to the contrary, despite potential eligibility, many economic victims we interviewed did not seek and were not receiving disaster aid at all.” In other words, entrenched economic and bureaucratic barriers ushered in a second wave of trauma for immigrants and the poor. 
There's one potential ray of light in the aftermath of Sandy: a wake-up call for a massive public investments to beef up the city’s defenses against climate change. A strong transit system is integral to an environmentally sustainable urban grid. And a targeted overhaul of New York’s creaky bus and subway lines could deliver equity to low-income neighborhoods in two ways: greater access to good jobs in other areas, and investment in decent local transit and construction jobs that help make neighborhoods more economically and ecologically resilient. Veronica Vanterpool of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, which advocates for equitable regional transit policies, tells In These Times that transit is sometimes glossed over in the debates about creating so-called green jobs in both building and operating mass transit systems. In fact, she said, "transit equity does encompass... increased opportunity to these [job] fields that traditionally have not been marketed to these marginalized communities."
In the immediate aftermath, however, recovery work--from restoring electricity to rebuilding homes--will be grueling, hazardous and handled by unions that often come under political and economic siege. As Jamilah King points out at Colorlines.com, workers in the city’s transit union, long a bulwark of black and Latino labor (and of militant public-sector organizing) will lead the repair of a city whose politicians have been steadily eroding their working conditions and benefits.
New York will survive Sandy, but so will the city's persistent inequalities and environmental precarity. So when the electricity comes back on, working people should understand that before the next crisis hits, they need to leverage the devastation to generate new political and economic power.

Monday, October 22, 2012

NOTES FROM A NATIVE SON


 IF CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE, THEY SHOULD ALSO BE LIABLE AS PEOPLE.
Statement From Ben Ikari

ACCORDING TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (2010), CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE. I AGREE TO THIS PROPOSITION OR CONCEPT. THE COURT IS RIGHT. PEOPLE THINK THROUGH, PLAN AND ESTABLISH, RUN CORPORATIONS. THEREFORE, CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE WHEN LOOKING FROM A SIMPLE CREATIVE, BUSINESS AND LEGAL STANDPOINT. WE ALSO KNOW OBVIOUSLY THAT,  CORPORATIONS ARE SIMPLY INANIMATE; LEGAL ENTITIES; THEY DON'T THINK OR SPEAK. CORPORATIONS DON'T WALK, EAT NOR ESTABLISH AND RUN THEMSELVES. THEY AREN'T PEOPLE FROM A LIVING THING OR BEING THAT BREATHES STANDPOINT-VAGUE NAME THEY HAVE.

GIVEN THE SUPREME COURT'S PROPOSITION AND BUSINESS THINKING, HOWEVER,  IT'S TIME THE OWNERS, SHAREHOLDERS, PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS OF CORPORATIONS COME TO TERMS WITH THEIR OWN REALITY AND ACCEPT CORPORATE LIABILITY. THIS IS ESPECIALLY  WHEN IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AS THEY ARE LIABLE WHEN IN VIOLATION OF DOMESTIC/NATIONAL  LAWS, WHICH MOSTLY AGREE WITH AND INCORPORATE THE FORMER. THESE OWNERS OF CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BIG-WINGS SHOULD OWN UP THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES BECAUSE CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE AS CERTIFIED BY LAW-THE SUPREME COURT.

CORPORATIONS SHOULD NOT ONLY BE ALLOWED THE FREE PASS TO BE PEOPLE TO SPEND MONEY RECKLESSLY AND BUY ELECTIONS,THUS DESTROYING THE ELECTORAL CUM POLITICAL FABRIC OR FRAMEWORK OF AMERICA, ETC. AND FORCING LEADERSHIP AND DEMOCRACY FROM THE GRASSROOTS TO BECOME  MONEY CONTEST. THEY SHOULD AS WELL AND EXPEDITIOUSLY BE PEOPLE ACROSS THE BOARD WITH THE AIM OR OBJECTIVE OF DOING RIGHT BY EVERY PEOPLE: INDIVIDUALS, COMMUNITIES AND ETHNIC NATIONALITIES OR GROUPS; ORGANIZATIONS AND NATION-STATES, AND NOT JUST THEMSELVES ALONE.

MEANING, IF CORPORATIONS ARE THE PEOPLE WHICH THEY ARE, HAVE FREE PASS TO DO BUSINESS EVERYWHERE IN THE WORLD BECAUSE THEY ARE PEOPLE, THEY ALSO SHOULD BE WILLING AND ABLE (OR MAKE TO, OR AS WITH THEIR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) MANIFESTOS THAT SHOULD NOT PRECLUDE HUMAN RIGHTS) TO DO RIGHT BY ALL PEOPLES. THIS IS  IRRESPECTIVE OF COLOR AND LANGUAGE, NATIONALITY, GROUP, RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL AFFILIATION OR SEX AMONG OTHER VARIATIONS. DOING  THE CONTRARY MEANS  DISCRIMINATION (CORPORATE), WHICH AMERICAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW PROHIBIT, THOUGH THEY EXIST.

 ON A MORE SERIOUS NOTE, THE PIRATES OF YESTER-YEARS (AS WITH LEADERS OF MILITIA OR REBEL GROUPS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OR REGULAR INDIVIDUALS) WHICH  THE FIRST U.S. CONGRESS ENVISAGED IN ITS 1789 ALIEN TORT STATUTE (ATS) OGONIS HAVE USED IN THE KIOBEL ET AL CASE TO TRY TO BRING THEIR TORMENTOR  TO JUSTICE, ARE THE $HELLS OF TODAY! $HELL OIL, AS PIRATES' INCORPORATED; HOW ABOUT THAT? IT'S CONSISTENT OR COMPATIBLE INDEED!

LIKE THE MANY $HELL'S ARGUMENTS/BRIEFS I HAVE READ IN THIS CASE, IT'S BIZARRE, DESPICABLE WHEN I SAT AT THE SUPREME COURT MONDAY, OCT. 1 AND HEARD $HELL'S LAWYER KATHLEEN SULLIVAN AND THE OBAMA SOLICITOR-GENERAL, DONALD VERRILLI JR. ASKING THE JUSTICES TO NOT ALLOW THESE EGREGIOUS CRIMES TRIED IN USA.

SULLIVAN'S CORE REASONS: THE ATS DIDN'T INTEND TO CORRECT OR PUNISH CORPORATIONS BUT INDIVIDUALS,AS THOUGH CORPORATIONS ESTABLISH AND RUN THEMSELVES.  WHEN SHE IS PAID FOR HER LEGAL SERVICES A ROBOT KNOWN AS CORPORATION DO NOT PAY HER. HUMAN BEINGS/PEOPLE DISCUSS, NEGOTIATE WITH HER OR HER REPRESENTATIVE (S) AND PROCESS HER PAYMENT. SO WHILE SOME MAY EXPRESS SYMPATHY FOR THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT FOR ITS NATIONAL OIL INTEREST, OR THE NEED FOR SOME TO THINKER THE RECENT SUBJECT MATTER (EXTRATERRITORIALITY, WHICH THE ATS, AS THE NAME IMPLIES  ALREADY SETTLED) IN THE KIOBEL V. $HELL CASE. THIS CASE BOILS DOWN TO THE 2010 SUPREME COURT RULING, THAT CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE, AS CITED ABOVE. THIS IS A CONCEPT GOV.  MITT ROMNEY BOUGHT AND, AGAIN,  I AGREE BECAUSE CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE.

NOTE THAT SULLIVAN ALSO REASONED THAT CORPORATIONS AREN'T LIABLE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THAT THE CRIMES $HELL IS DEFENDING WERE NOT COMMITTED IN USA SO HER CLIENT SHOULD BE LET LOOSE TO COMMIT FURTHER CRIMES DESPITE THE CHECKS AND BALANCES PUT IN PLACE BY THE ATS. IT IS TRUE THAT THE ATS DID NOT SAY EXPRESSLY THAT CORPORATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO ITS PROVISIONS/JURISDICTION. IT ALSO DID NOT SAY THEY ARE NOT. SO SULLIVAN'S/$HELL'S ARGUMENTS ARE IRRELEVANT, ESPECIALLY WHERE CRIMES PROHIBITED BY THE LAW OF NATIONS,WHICH THE ATS SUBSCRIBES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. THERE IS NO SERIOUS SOCIETY THAT WILL GRANT EXPRESS PASSPORT TO CORPORATIONS (OR ANY GROUP/PERSONS) TO KILL BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT MENTIONED DIRECTLY IN THE LAWS SET FORTH AGAINST KILLING AND RELATED OFFENSES/CRIMES.

 AS WITH PIRATES, IF CORPORATIONS CAN BE LIABLE UNDER DOMESTIC OR NATIONAL LAW,THEN NOTHING BARS THEM FROM BEING LIABLE WHEN THEY COMMIT OR AID AND ABET THE COMMISSION OF CRIMES AGAINST THE LAW OF NATIONS SUCH AS TORTURE, EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLING, OTHER CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND GENOCIDE $HELL IS CHARGED WITH,THUS  DEFENDING. IN ADDITION, $HELL OWNERS AND SOME OTHER OWNERS OF CORPORATIONS OR MANAGEMENT HAVE PIRATES' ATTITUDES AND THESE ATTITUDES ARE OBVIOUS AS CAN BE SEEN IN THE MANNER OGONIS (NIGER DELTANS) AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT ARE TREATED BY $HELL, EXXON MOBILE AND OTHER WESTERN CORPORATIONS IN NIGERIA.

  MEANWHILE, THE OBAMA GOVERNMENT'S ARGUMENT THROUGH ITS SOLICITOR-GENERAL WAS THAT AMERICA SHALL SUFFER ADVERSE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES FROM NIGERIA, OTHER NATIONS. THIS IS, OF COURSE, AN UNFOUNDED PROPOSITION, AS NO SUCH EVIDENCE EXIST AFTER SOSA V. ALVAREZ MACHAIN DECISION IN 2004, ETC. ALSO, USA WILL REMAIN A BIG AID GIVER TO NIGERIA DESPITE THE OIL RESERVES THE ILLEGAL/BRITISH-FRAUDULENTLY CREATED COUNTRY STOLE FROM NIGER DELTANS, CAUSING CORRUPTION, UNTOLD HARDSHIP,ENVIRONMENT RUINATION AND DEATH TO THE PEOPLE.

 IT IS THIS SAME ATS THE CHIEF ABIOLA FAMILY AND OTHERS OF NIGERIA USED TO DRAG FORMER HEAD OF STATE ABDUSALAMI ABUBAKAR TO USA COURT, AND IT SETTLED OUT OF COURT UNDER FORMER PRESIDENT OLUSEGUN OBASANJO, I BELIEVE. $HELL ALSO SETTLED THE WIWA ET AL V. $HELL IN 2009 UNDER THIS LAW OR JURISDICTION. THERE ARE FRESH PRECEDENT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE ATS,WHEREAS THE OBAMA LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE COULD NOT POINT TO ONE PRECEDENT JUSTIFYING GOVERNMENT FEAR. THE ONLY ISSUE HERE THEREFORE, IS CORPORATE FEAR (HENCE PRESSURE) FOR LIABILITIES THAT MAY ARISE DUE TO SUSPECTED OR POSSIBLE DECADES OF CRIMINAL/DEADLY ACTIVITIES FOR PROFIT-MAKING ABROAD.

 NO ADVERSE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES NOR STRAINED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NIGERIA HAS ENSUED NOR WOULD ENSUE CONTRARY TO USA GOVERNMENT'S ARGUMENT, WHICH THE SOLICITOR-GENERAL CLAIMED WAS "PERSUASIVE" WHEN ASKED HIS COMPELLING REASONS, INSTEAD OF REFERRING TO ANY CASE-LAW TO THIS EFFECT. IN SHORT, THE CURRENT GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA DID NOT AND  IS NOT PUTTING FORWARD ANY SOVEREIGNTY OR EXTRATERRITORIAL ARGUMENT IN THIS CASE, BECAUSE IT'S NON SEQUITUR CONSIDERING INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE PROVISIONS OF ATS.

UNFORTUNATELY, OBAMA GOVERNMENT WILL  FEEL COMFORTABLE IF THIS ROGUE, TERRORIST AND DEADLY $HELL AND ITS LIKES/USA CORPS,WHICH HAVE COMMITTED OR MAY COMMIT SIMILAR CRIMES IN AFRICA FOR PROFIT AND AMERICAN BENEFIT ARE SET FREE. LIKE $HELL,THIS GOVERNMENT WILL FEEL SATISFIED IF THESE EXPLOITATIVE AND OPPRESSIVE CORPORATIONS COMMIT TORTURE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMAN AND GENOCIDE/CORPSNOCIDE IN AFRICA AND OTHER DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND ALLOWED UNCHECKED.

IRONICALLY, USA HAS HUMAN RIGHTS AS ONE OF ITS MOST IMPORTANT FOREIGN POLICIES. IT IS  DISAPPOINTING THAT OBAMA/HIS ADMINISTRATION,WHICH SUPPORTED OUR CASE IN FEBRUARY WHEN WE FIRST APPEARED BEFORE THE COURT SEEMS TO HAVE TURNED DUE TO WHAT APPEARS TO BE CORPORATE PRESSURE. MEANWHILE, LET IT BE KNOWN THAT ANY GOVERNMENT/GROUP,WHICH SUPPORT $HELL IN THIS CASE SUPPORTS TORTURE AND GENOCIDE AGAINST OGONI AND OTHER CORPORATELY OPPRESSED GROUPS AROUND THE GLOBE. BY THIS FACT OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE SUPPORTING THESE CRIMES TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE OPPRESSED, DISADVANTAGED, WEAK AND POOR.

FINALLY, THE ONLY HOPE NOW IS THE SUPREME COURT WHICH IS INDEPENDENT OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH YET DEPENDENT AS JUSTICES ARE DIVIDED ON PARTY/PHILOSOPHICAL, IDEOLOGICAL LINES. THE CONSOLATION THOUGH, IS THE LEGALISTIC PRECEDENT, AND CREDIBILITY (INTEGRITY), MORALITY TEST OF THE COURT- HENCE THE NEED FOR THE  PRESERVATION OF THE STARE DECISIS DOCTRINE. THESE HONORABLE AND RESPECTED JUSTICES HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY, DUTY TO HELP STOP TORTURE AND GENOCIDE BY UPHOLDING HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS, WHICH INCLUDES THEIR OWN LEGAL AND MORAL AUTHORITY AND LEGACY IN SOSA ABOVE.

IF THEY RULE IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFFS, THE COURT MUST HAVE SENT A SERIOUS SIGNAL/CORRECTIVE MESSAGE TO THE ENVIRONMENTALLY RACIST, POLLUTANT AND KILLER CORPORATION-$HELL AND ITS LIKES. IF TO THE CONTRARY,THEN $HELL AND OTHER SUCH CORPS SHALL BE EMBOLDENED AND GRANTED THE FREE PASSPORT AS PIRATES/KILLERS' INCORPORATED TO KILL FOR PROFIT WITHOUT RECOURSE OR LOOKING BACK. THIS WILL BE A GREAT BLOW, SETBACK TO HUMAN RIGHTS, AND IT WILL BE UNFORTUNATE!


THE AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE CAN BE REACHED AT BAMCKARY@HOTMAIL.COM.